Jennifer+Didier+8-A.W.

Roosevelt Student: 8-A.W.

Hey, I’m Andrew and I’m just your mild-mannered junior taking AP Lang. I enjoy hanging out with friends the most, and I don’t have a preference in school subjects. I’m not going to lie to you, I’m not a great writer, but I’m trying to improve my skills and I’m always willing to take advice. I have great diction when I try, but I’m lacking in most other areas. I’m willing to take all help you can give me. I’m looking forward to working with someone who can look over my attempts at essays with an unbiased eye.
 * Letters of Introduction ( **due 01.21.11 **) **

Hello Andrew!

My name is Jenny. I am a Junior Writing and Secondary Education double major. I am extremely excited to get started and see your writing! My job, and my pleasure, during this project is to give you feedback on your writing that facilitates your own thinking and analysis and to, hopefully, not bore you to death.

I am really looking forward to learning from each other through this process, and I will try to be as unbiased as possible.

All the best, Jenny

Hey Jenny, we're just testing out how these iPads look and work.


 * Rough Draft - Definition ( ****RHS** due 01.27.11; **171** due 01.28.11 **) **

Have you ever wondered what a perfect society would be like? Or wonder if it is even possible? There are many different opinions on the matter, but they all agree on thing; it would be perfect. Utopia is a concept of a perfect or ideal society. Most people believe that a utopian society distinguished by having ideal aspects of politics, morality, and social structure. One view of the social structure is where polyculturalism, where all cultures are inter-related, is utilized and all religions or statuses are accepted. While some others believe that everyone will be of the same religion or social status and will therefore, agree on most things. Sorry this is all I have so far, this is about where I got writer’s block. I have the rest of the paper planned out, but can’t seem to put the ideas to words. In case you want to see my thought process I’ll include my second paragraph structure with bullets.

· Plausibility of a Utopia § What would happen to rest of the population? § Is Humankind worthy of Utopia? § When would something like this happen?

Input of any kind would be very welcome, for I am at a loss. _ Hello Andrew, I struggle with writing papers as well, even though I am a writing major and apparently people say I am good at it... so I completely know where you are coming from. Your topic deals with a lot of the abstract, which I think is where you are struggling.

One thing I think may help is thinking about your daily life and what really bugs you. Take notes on every time you are confused by someone's actions or angered by a situation or its consequences. Start really small instead of thinking of the "concept" part of your definition.

Another method would be to have a conversation with someone about your topic. Maybe have them type it out as you are talking and read it back to you. If you do not want to do that, you could even pretend to have a conversation with someone inside your paper. Maybe write a fake letter to the mayor of Des Moines, Frank Cownie. Get your ideas rolling in a concrete way.

I am really excited to meet you and your class today, and I have some notes written for you. I have a little hang-up with technology and would rather put comments directly on paper, so I will have that for you. I hope what I have given you so far helps at least a little bit.

Thanks, Jenny _ Hello, I sincerely apologize for these comments being late. My internet has been very touch-and-go, so I'm crossing my fingers that it will stay as I type this.
 * Revision - Definition ( ****RHS** due 01.31.11; **171** due 02.01.11 **) ** //[Hey Jenny, I decided to make this easier for both of us to put my comments in brackets and italicize them. This way I can share what I think about a certain part without disrupting the flow too much.]// Have you ever wondered what a perfect society would be like? Or wonder if it is even possible? A lot of people have ideas on how this society would be organized, but as of yet none have been proven correct. There are many different opinions on the matter, but they all agree on thing; it would be perfect. Utopia is a concept of a perfect or ideal society. Most people believe that a utopian society is distinguished by having perfect or ideal aspects of politics, morality, and social structure. Since utopia is a perfect idea, it won’t advance in technology. Nothing gets better than perfection. //[I’m not sure what paragraph I want this sentence in. It partly defines utopia so I would think it would work in this paragraph, but at the same time it’s putting doubt into your mind of whether utopia is possible so it could be in the next paragraph too.]//One view of the social structure is where polyculturalism, where all cultures are inter-related, is utilized and all religions or statuses are accepted. While some others believe that everyone will be of the same religion or social status and will therefore, agree on most things. The real question is //[ok, so I have no idea what sort of punctuation here]// Is a utopian society possible? The sheer logistics of it are unrealistic. Which continent has the most viable resources or the least unpredictable weather? This surrounding area would have to provide enough natural resources to sustain a small city and be able to cultivate numerous species of crops. What of the rest of the world? Are the citizens of other cities trying to bribe, fight, and smuggle themselves in or would said utopia only be possible after some sort of genocide or a nuclear holocaust leaving the few survivors left to scrape together their version of perfection? //[I’m not sure if I want so many questions in here, but they seemed like the best way to express my ideas.]// //[What you said about research made me wonder if I should include a 3rd paragraph with past utopian movements, and what happened to them. I can always include some of them into my other paragraphs if you think that would be better, but I’m going to type up a rough draft of the paragraph.]// //﻿// One of the first American experiments to try constructing a utopian society was Robert Owen, who created the New Harmony Community in Indiana in 1825. It was an experiment in reforming the community and a socialist community where all labor and profit was divided equally, but collapsed a few months after it had been started. The community deviated into several smaller sub-communities who eventually broke out into fighting and left New Harmony in anarchy. //[The theme of asking questions kind of emerged on its own and seems like the best way to voice the problems with utopia, but I’m worried about the flow of the paper. Also I’m not exactly sure whether or not I should capitalize utopia. After writing that last paragraph, personally I think I should leave it out, it doesn’t fit with the rest of the essay and just adds unnecessary information that would confuse the reader. ]//

"Nothing gets better than perfection."- Is this true for everyone, though? Do some people think perfect is not really the ideal? My interpretation of your argument is that utopia is not possible because perfection is so subjective. Your inclusion of the Robert Owen research can be very convincing if you explore the reasons as to why it did not work. It could be helpful to your argument when you say that the community "left New Harmony in anarchy" to explore that avenue. Many Americans believe anarchy is the best solution for our country... contradicts the idea we talked about on Monday in terms of organization/structure, right?

"Since utopia is a perfect idea, it won’t advance in technology."- But what about the people whose jobs are to come up with these advancements? Would a stagnant community really be perfect for everybody? I find this point very interesting.

Again, what I find you struggling with is all the ideas you've got! Your brackets may have held you back a bit in this draft, as I think it would be helpful to really get out of your academic concerns for this paper and let your mind get into the nitty gritty of your ideas. But that is my own Mad Hatter approach to writing, and you should do whatever works best for you. I, of course, do not know your brain better than you do. Speaking of your brackets, it seems you are worried about the organization of your ideas and whether or not your questions are pointing the reader to your definition of utopia. Your second paragraph paints a grim picture of the possibilities for utopia. Perhaps the physical details are impossible and this could be a paragraph on its own. The questions would be stronger if you included research to back this idea (research being the past utopian movements you mention).

The Robert Owen attempt reminds me of communism, but I do not know if you want to go that far. Perhaps if you quote some of the research and tie it all back in to your definition and its impossibility, the notion would come out on its own.

Keep thinking and keep linking! So your definition of utopia is a perfect or ideal society. But you have tweaked it as your own personal definition (which is great) by saying it most likely is impossible. That is essentially a thesis. If you want help in organizing your thoughts, think about every idea you've got as a little brace for your thesis, its support. When you throw out a question, you're giving the thesis a toothpick support. When you include your research to give one possible answer to the question, you're adding like 10 toothpicks. When you then link your use of evidence to your thesis, you begin a foundation of 50 toothpicks. And at the end of your paper, when all points have been laid out, evidenced, and linked, you've got a full scaffolding for your definition and the reader completely understands what utopia is, what utopia is to you, and what problems stand in its way of ever coming to fruition.

Sorry if my hippie approach does nothing for you. I am getting to know your writing and you as a writer, so this is a bit of a trial and error process. Keep up the thinking, though! The number one part of writing for me is the amount of thinking and reflecting one must do. We organize our ideas in our heads every day. The challenge is to communicate that organization on paper.


 * FINAL - Definition ( ****RHS** due 02.02.11; **171** due 02.04.11 **) **

Have you ever wondered what a perfect society would be like? Or wonder if it is even possible? A lot of people have ideas on how this society would be organized, but as of yet none have been proven correct. There are many different opinions on the matter, but they all agree on **one** thing; it would be perfect. Utopia is a concept of a perfect or ideal society. Most people believe that a utopian society **is** distinguished by (**Perhaps using an active verb here would be a stronger choice, instead of "is distinguished by."**) having perfect or ideal aspects of politics, morality, and social structure. Some think utopia would be a perfect culture, so it won’t advance in technology. All the available advances in technology will have been made. Nothing gets better than perfection. (**How is this tied to your technology argument?)** Another sees it as continuous advancements, the age-old paradoxical argument of imperfect perfection. One view of the social structure is where polyculturalism, where all cultures are inter-related, is utilized and all religions or statuses are accepted. While some others believe that everyone will be of the same religion or social status and will therefore, agree on most things. The real question is: is a utopian society possible? The sheer logistics of it are unrealistic. Which continent has the most viable resources or the least unpredictable weather? This surrounding area would have to provide enough natural resources to sustain a small city and be able to cultivate numerous species of crops. What of the rest of the world? Are the citizens of other cities trying to bribe, fight, and smuggle themselves in or would said utopia only be possible after some sort of genocide or a nuclear holocaust leaving the few survivors left to scrape together their version of perfection? **This is exactly the image I get when I think of attempting to create a utopia. It seems you are touching on the idea of sacrificing for perfection. I find your argument very convincing here because you go from the basic to the more complex with concrete images. Is there a way to highlight this? In terms of organization, it may help you to really think of the "So what?" of it all. I guess I am assigning the "sacrificing for perfection" as the "So What" of this last image, but perhaps you meant something different. I see in your reflection that you are concerned about lengthening your paragraphs. This "So What" technique could really help you there. When you've got an idea, keep asking, "So what!?" So genocide might be the first step to creating a utopia. So what? This is how I got to my sacrifice bit. And you could even go further. Why is it important to think about this idea of giving something up in order to be perfect? Maybe you are just touching on the fact that perfection is very controversial, especially when it is "in the eye of the beholder." Either way, hinting in the beginning of the paragraph that this is where your ideas are taking you makes the paper more sound, less like you are "writing your way" to the conclusions, as they say. Perhaps you did not realize that your argument is so complex. That's where asking the "So What" genuinely helps you become a more organized (and generative) thinker.** While utopia describes the faultless community, there are varying accounts based on personal opinion. What would your utopia consist of? An island paradise? Or perhaps on top of a mountain? Will it be a cultural mixing pot with every ethnicity, gender, and sexual orientation treated equally and celebrated? Maybe far in the future when the human race has become unisex and uses asexual reproduction? All in all the interpretation of the definition of utopia changes with the paradigm. After all perfection is in the eye of the beholder.

Sorry for the extremely late post, I was sick all weekend and I couldn't more than glance at the computer screen. I'm pretty happy with the way I have the first 3 paragraphs but i couldn't find a way to include the Robert Owen information. Also if you see any grammatical errors please edit or underline them or something.


 * Andrew,**
 * You raise some very thought-provoking questions in your definition paper, through both literal questions and through touching on important aspects, like the "paradoxical argument of imperfect perfection." You bring up technological, cultural, and physical conflicting ideas, which help to address a diverse audience of opinions. I addressed what I feel are your main concerns in your second to last paragraph.**


 * I feel we are both apologizing for lateness too much, haha, so let's say we try our best from here on out to make the deadlines! This sort of thing can have a domino-effect since I know we are both so busy and crave routine from time to time.**


 * All the best,**
 * Jenny**
 * REFLECTION #1 ****( ****RHS** due 02.08.11; **171** due 02.11.11 **<span style="font-family: 'Lucida Sans Unicode','Lucida Grande',sans-serif;">) **

1) I feel my fluency and my examples improved the most during this first essay 2) The ideas that my drake helper gave me and the ability to express those ideas 3) I personally think that I need to work on lengthening my paragraphs

I don't really have a rough draft but here is the outline I've been thinking about
 * <span style="font-family: 'Lucida Sans Unicode','Lucida Grande',sans-serif;">Rough Draft - Classification/Division ( **<span style="font-family: 'Lucida Sans Unicode','Lucida Grande',sans-serif;">**RHS** due 02.16.11; **171** due 02.18.11 **<span style="font-family: 'Lucida Sans Unicode','Lucida Grande',sans-serif;">) **

1. Religion a. All religions are accpepted b. One religion (strict following) 2. Racial a. Equality for all b. Only one race allowed, all others excluded c. Racial hierarchy (slavery for some) 3. Government a. Socialist b. Capitalist 4. Class a. Necessary for survival b. Only the wealthy/impoverished
 * Utopia**

I plan to use the idea of who wants this particular utopian society and what the motivation for each is. I also need to do a lot of research for this.

Hey jenny here it is, i decided not to include any examples as of yet and because of that haven't written the conclusion yet.
 * <span style="font-family: 'Lucida Sans Unicode','Lucida Grande',sans-serif;">Revision - Classification/Division ( **<span style="font-family: 'Lucida Sans Unicode','Lucida Grande',sans-serif;">**RHS** due 02.23.11; **171** due 02.25.11 **<span style="font-family: 'Lucida Sans Unicode','Lucida Grande',sans-serif;">) **

**Subjective Perfection** The idea of a perfect society is amorphous and ever-changing. Different people have different ideals and to them that perfection would solve their every pet peeve. <span style="color: #f420e6; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">Your paper deals with more serious, institutional issues, so perhaps "pet peeve" is a bit too light of a term. Everyone has their own personal opinion of what would be the epitome of perfection. There is no way to divide and define all the variations of the concept **The concept of perfection or Utopia?**, but it is not so difficult to broaden the categories and pin down the main ideas. I am left feeling like this paragraph oversimplifies your argument. You divide the specific topic of Utopia, not just perfection, so this paragraph may benefit from connecting the idea of subjective perfection specifically to Utopia. Also, why is it important that we broaden these categories? Why have you chosen these specific main ideas? __Religion__ Religion in itself has caused numerous wars and countless disputes. <span style="color: #d53ef4; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">As we said earlier during our meeting, these categories basically divide Utopia into the different motivations or avenues taken to create a Utopia. So perhaps form a sentence here about why religion has caused these disputes. The very mention of a religious stereotype causes rage or riot. A topic this controversial can only be resolved in one of two ways; complete dominance of one religion to create an ecclesiarchy or acceptance of all faiths, not just tolerance but true acceptance. __Race__ There are some out there **I feel this wording is a bit hesitant. Do not shy away from your cynicism!** that still view some races as a superior faction of humanity. These people will view a community of only one race as faultless. **So this would be Utopia to the "some out there?"** Where all but one people are either excluded or (INSERT CLEVER EUPHEMISM HERE). **I find it better to not force a "clever euphemism." What are you trying to achieve by using one? And why in just this category?** Though still prejudiced, but not as drastic as the former, is the racial hierarchy; a system where one ethnic group runs the government and controls the others as indentured workers or slaves. Simply put this is a caste system, where each separate caste is a race. The final category of a Racial Utopia, is the one where everyone is treated as an equal. All types of cultures are celebrated and accepted, and no one is insulted or looked down upon by skin color or accent. This paragraph (along with your Class category) is a bit longer than the others. What do you think the reason for this is? Are these the dominant reasons Utopia cannot be achieved? Or are these the ones we hear most about, and is it useful to address why?

__ Government __ It seems you mainly want to focus on the economic part here. Socialism deals with economy AND politics, while capitalism is an economic system. Of course our government thrives on capital, but I won't get into that. Throughout history there have been many types of governing bodies, but two of the most successful have been Capitalism and Socialism. The Socialist society follows the theory of being equal; whereas Capitalism further divides the people into classes. "Further" divides? So I see you believe we are divided under other categories (religion, race, class), but what about Capitalism further divides us? Why would we use this system if we didn't think it would make change for the better. Your average reader may back away from a statement like this without any pampering. Especially related to Utopia, think of the Industrial Revolution in terms of striving for perfection. I think of Chicago. Here is where research, again, will really help you out (and is really interesting!).

__Class__ The problem with class is the people on the upper levels, who have the most control, enjoy being on top. The rich and wealthy would enjoy a paradise, all to themselves, if they could; although the same could be said of all classes. Even the impoverished? With a class system, to be happy<span style="color: #ff00f8; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">**,** all the residents of the community must be on the same economic or social step. What if there was a disaster that destroyed most of the world’s population and permanently scarred the earth? Would the rich act rich? Would they survive if they did? If there was an asteroid impact or nuclear holocaust the classes would be abolished. As would any idea of racism or stereotypes. If you needed medical attention, you would not refuse the only doctor for a thousand miles merely because he is a black. This other kind of utopia would wipe clean the slate and revert all survivors to a basic measure. True equality.

ok so this is my third try to post this hopefully it stays up this time.

Andrew- I encourage you to not shy away from research. Since you are writing about race, class, government, and religion, your reader will automatically connect information to historical and current events, but they may not be the images you want them to think of. Researching may help you to form a more directed argument. I know you feel strongly about this topic, but I feel you back away from the skeptical or "Hopeful cynic" tone we talked about. What drives you to write about this? Frustration? Disappointment in society? If you've got the research to back it up, you can take a more authoritative tone in your writing.


 * <span style="font-family: 'Lucida Sans Unicode','Lucida Grande',sans-serif;">FINAL - Classification/Division ( **<span style="font-family: 'Lucida Sans Unicode','Lucida Grande',sans-serif;">**RHS** due 03.01.11; **171** due 03.04.11 **<span style="font-family: 'Lucida Sans Unicode','Lucida Grande',sans-serif;">) **

The idea of a perfect society is amorphous and ever-changing. Different people have different ideals and to them that perfection would solve their every grievance. Everyone has their own personal opinion of what would be the epitome of perfection. By this logic everyone will have their own idea of a perfect society. There is no way to divide and define all the variations of the concept of utopia, but it is not so difficult to broaden the categories and pin down the main ideas. __Religion__ By definition religion bases a following on faith, and there is no way to prove, or convince another of this faith. Religion in itself has caused numerous wars and countless disputes, because of the inability to express ones religion to those of a different belief. The very mention of a religious stereotype causes rage or riot. A topic this controversial can only be resolved in one of two ways; complete dominance of one religion to create an ecclesiarchy or acceptance of all faiths, not just tolerance but true acceptance. __Race__ There are a select few still out there that still view some races as a superior faction of humanity. These scant people will view a community of only one race as faultless. Where all but one people are either excluded or left to rot in some unmarked mass grave. Though still prejudiced, but not as drastic as the former, is the racial hierarchy; a system where one ethnic group runs the government and controls the others as indentured workers or slaves. Simply put this is a caste system, where each separate caste is a race. The final category of a Racial Utopia, is the one where everyone is treated as an equal. All types of cultures are celebrated and accepted, and no one is insulted or looked down upon by skin color or accent. __Government__ Throughout history there have been many types of governing bodies, but two of the most successful have been Capitalism and Socialism. Socialism defines everyone’s worth is equal, where no matter who you are there will always be someone to help. Capitalism encourages the rich to grow richer and puts the poor in rut, almost never gaining wealth. The Socialist society follows the theory of being equal; whereas Capitalism further divides the people into classes. __Class__ The problem with class is the people on the upper levels, who have the most control, enjoy being on top. The rich and wealthy would enjoy a paradise, all to themselves, if they could; although the same could be said of all classes. With a class system, to be happy all the residents of the community must be on the same economic or social step. What if there was a disaster that destroyed most of the world’s population and permanently scarred the earth? Would the rich act rich? Would they survive if they did? If there was an asteroid impact or nuclear holocaust the classes would be abolished. As would any idea of racism or stereotypes. If you needed medical attention, you would not refuse the only doctor for a thousand miles merely because he is a black. This other kind of utopia would wipe clean the slate and revert all survivors to a basic measure. True equality. In the end, there could be any combination of the variations listed above. There could be a utopia specifically for the poor who believe in socialism, or for the white Christian supremacists. One of the most memorable utopian movements is Adolf Hitler’s. While he is viewed as a monster, it does not change the fact that he was trying to create his own idea of utopia. The problem, which put the world in a crisis, with his concept was there would be no tolerance for anything other than his image of perfection. Perfection cannot be taken with force, only obtained when searching for something else.


 * //sorry for the late post but it was due to situations out of my hands//**
 * //and due to the afore mentioned situations i lost my beautifully worded 3 page essay, this is what i could salvage after hours of work//**
 * //and i still couldn't think of a closing sentence, i need some help on this one. I want to say something along the lines of "you need to pick your perfection" but can't find a way to word it.//**


 * <span style="font-family: 'Lucida Sans Unicode','Lucida Grande',sans-serif;">REFLECTION #2 ****<span style="font-family: 'Lucida Sans Unicode','Lucida Grande',sans-serif;">( **<span style="font-family: 'Lucida Sans Unicode','Lucida Grande',sans-serif;">**RHS** due 03.22.11; **171** due 03.25.11 **<span style="font-family: 'Lucida Sans Unicode','Lucida Grande',sans-serif;">) **

ok, so the reason i havent posted anything here is becauses i do not have any ideas on how to write this one. i want to say that i think the only way humanity will achieve a utopian society would be after some horrible, earth-scarring event. (i.e. asteriod or nuclear meltdown) i just cant think of reasons to support that or even how to say it. so far the outline i have in my head is some where along the lines of: intro-explanation body 1-elimination of bigotry body 2-bring communities together body 3(?)-counter argument conclusion
 * <span style="font-family: 'Lucida Sans Unicode','Lucida Grande',sans-serif;">Rough Draft - Argument ( **<span style="font-family: 'Lucida Sans Unicode','Lucida Grande',sans-serif;">**RHS** due 03.30.11; **171** due 04.01.11 **<span style="font-family: 'Lucida Sans Unicode','Lucida Grande',sans-serif;">) **

It may be difficult to find the research to back this argument up if you focus solely on this catastrophic event. I am also looking at your definition papers and see that there is argument within those. You argue that Utopia is not possible because perfection is subjective. But your idea of a Utopia, as I see in your outline, is that bigotry is eliminated and a strong community is formed. Have we seen this attempted in history? You wanted to look into Hitler before...maybe you will find use for that now. Thanks and see you this afternoon.
 * <span style="font-family: 'Lucida Sans Unicode','Lucida Grande',sans-serif;">Revision (1) - Argument ( **<span style="font-family: 'Lucida Sans Unicode','Lucida Grande',sans-serif;">**RHS** due 04.05.11; **171** due 04.08.11 **<span style="font-family: 'Lucida Sans Unicode','Lucida Grande',sans-serif;">) **

this is what ive got so far. i couldnt think of a good hook for the intro so that will come later. and i want to say that i was wrong about Owen's ideas and what he tried to do.
 * <span style="font-family: 'Lucida Sans Unicode','Lucida Grande',sans-serif;">Revision (2) - Argument ( **<span style="font-family: 'Lucida Sans Unicode','Lucida Grande',sans-serif;">**RHS** due 04.13.11; **171** due 04.15.11 **<span style="font-family: 'Lucida Sans Unicode','Lucida Grande',sans-serif;">) **

Trying to achieve utopia creates dytopia. Most everyone in Germany believed in Adolf Hitler’s idea of an Aryan Utopia. His charisma, authority, and vision persuaded many to follow him and his dream. He dreamed of a world where the Aryan race, blonde hair and blue eyes, was the master race and above all others. After convincing the masses with propaganda, he implemented concentration camps for the Jewish living within his country. Once there, the prisoners were systematically put to death. When the German people learned how this utopia was to be achieved they were sickened at the thought of building perfection on corpses. He, unwisely, started this secret genocide during a time when he needed the peoples’ support. Hitler was not satisfied with perfecting his Germany, but wanted to purge the world of the undesirables. Being cleansed was not something the rest of the world would tolerate. A less known example of a failed attempt at perfection is that of New Harmony. Robert Owen had a vision of a sequestered communal society, all working together to achieve peace and enlightenment. When Owen purchased the land for New Harmony, in November 1824, he offered the 800 available spots to anyone who wished to live in his dream for the future. New Harmony agreed as a whole to prohibit the possession of commodities, such as money. Instead of currency, the residents earned the ability to earn necessities according to how long they labored. Participation was required to obtain goods, so all people were treated equally and got a fair share of labor. While these ideas worked well in theory, in practice the people were not held together by any means. With a lack of a central shared belief or even a government, New Harmony soon dissolved into a myriad of sub-communities. After three years of living in another man’s utopia, most of the residents left or abandoned this experiment.


 * <span style="font-family: 'Lucida Sans Unicode','Lucida Grande',sans-serif;">FINAL - Argument ( **<span style="font-family: 'Lucida Sans Unicode','Lucida Grande',sans-serif;">**RHS** due 04.19.11; **171** due 04.22.11 **<span style="font-family: 'Lucida Sans Unicode','Lucida Grande',sans-serif;">) **


 * <span style="font-family: 'Lucida Sans Unicode','Lucida Grande',sans-serif;">REFLECTION #3 ****<span style="font-family: 'Lucida Sans Unicode','Lucida Grande',sans-serif;">( **<span style="font-family: 'Lucida Sans Unicode','Lucida Grande',sans-serif;">**RHS** due 04.25.11 **<span style="font-family: 'Lucida Sans Unicode','Lucida Grande',sans-serif;">) **